Bog versus fen, answered in numbers
A bog is fed only by rain, so its water stays acid — Sphagnum pools read pH 3.0-4.5 — and its nutrients stay scarce. A fen is fed by groundwater as well, so its water sits near pH 6.0-7.5 and sedges replace the moss carpet. Everything else in this guide follows from that one difference.
Numeric index
| Wetland type | Main water source | Typical pH | Nutrient level | Typical plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bog | Rainfall only | 3.0-4.5 | Very low | Sphagnum moss, heather, cotton-grass |
| Blanket bog | Rainfall only; needs about 1,000 mm a year | 3.0-4.5 | Very low | Sphagnum and cotton-grass over whole hillsides |
| Poor fen | Rain plus some groundwater seepage | Between 4.5 and 6.0 | Low | Sphagnum mixed with sedges |
| Rich fen | Groundwater plus rain | 6.0-7.5 | Moderate to high | Sedges, brown mosses, reeds |
| Swamp | Surface water and groundwater | Near neutral | High | Trees and shrubs on wet soil or shallow peat |
| Marsh | Surface flooding | Near neutral | High | Grasses, sedges and rushes; little or no peat |
A bog is fed only by rain; a fen is fed by groundwater as well — and that single difference sets the acidity, the plants and the peat.
Hydrologists call a rain-only wetland ombrotrophic: every drop it holds fell from the sky, carrying almost no dissolved minerals. A fen is minerotrophic: its water arrives after moving through soil and rock, picking up calcium and other bases on the way.
Because nothing buffers a bog's water, Sphagnum bog pools usually measure pH 3.0-4.5. Rich fen water, fed by mineral groundwater, sits near pH 6.0-7.5 — a gap of about three pH units, roughly a hundred- to thousand-fold difference in acidity.
Nutrients follow the same divide. Groundwater delivers bases and minerals, so fens support a richer flora; bogs run on rain and airborne dust alone, and only highly specialised plants cope.
Every figure here is a widely published peatland range — accumulation at 0.5-1 mm a year, bog pools at pH 3.0-4.5, rich fen water at pH 6.0-7.5 — cross-checked against Ramsar Convention reporting. The field procedure is ordered so that each step rules out one common misidentification before the next begins.
Where the numbers come from
Numbers follow ranges commonly published in peatland science and in Ramsar Convention materials; no single study is privileged over the consensus range.